Analysis of Pedestrian During The COVID – 19 Period in The Dago – Bandung Area

Muhammad Isradi; Nofila  Sari; Amar  Mufhidin; Widodo Budi  Dermawan; Mohammad  Khadem

Authors

Muhammad Isradi Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planing University of Mercu Buana Jakarta, Indonesia
Nofila Sari Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta
Amar Mufhidin Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta
Widodo Budi Dermawan Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta
Mohammad Khadem Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department Sultan Qaboos University Muscat

Keywords:

Dago – Bandung Area, Level of Service, Pedestrians, Sidewalks

Abstract

The sidewalk in the Dago - Bandung area is one of the sidewalks that is widely used by pedestrians because there are schools, campuses, hospitals, clothing stores and restaurant. This study to determine the average daily use of sidewalks in the Dago - Bandung area, identify sidewalk facilities, determine level of services sidewalks, and obtain pedestrian perceptions of sidewalk facilities. This study used the field survey to primary data and quisioner from pedestrians for secondary data. Analysis of sidewalk facilities uses the Regulation of the Minister of Public Works Number 3 of 2014 while level of service uses High Capacity Manual method. Pedestrian perceptions use the Importance Performance Analysis method. The survey showed on the largest pedestrian volume occurred on Sunday at 2.49 people/minute and it was found that the sidewalks in the Dago - Bandung area had met standards. Based on the results the level of service on the sidewalk is Standard A with the average pedestrian flow of 1.64 ppl/m/mnt and the average space for pedestrians of 34.62 m²/ppl. The results of the Cartesian diagram obtained in quadrant I. The main priority is the condition of the signage, the location of the street furniture, and the cleanliness of the channel. Overall, a few items need improvement in order to create better comfort for pedestrians.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dermawan, Widodo Budi, Hanayas Bagaskara, Muhammad Isradi, and Amar Mufhidin. 2021. “Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Analysis of Sidewalk or Pedestrian Path Satisfaction (Case Study of Casablanca Street, Kasablanka City Mall Area).” 5(1):53–63.

Direktur Jenderal Bina Marga, Keputusan. 1999. “Jalan Umum Lampiran No . 10 Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Bina Marga Departemen Pekerjaan Umum.” (032).

Hasanah, Budi. 2017. “Pelayanan Aksesibilitas Jalan Umum (Jalur Pedestrian) Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas (Studi Kasus Di Kota Serang).” IJTIMAIYA: Journal of Social Science Teaching 1(1). doi: 10.21043/ji.v1i1.3101.

Isradi, Muhammad, Acep Hidayat, and Joewono Prasetijo. 2020. “Guiding Paving Block Porous for Blind People.” HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration 11(1):79–86. doi: 10.2478/hjbpa-2020-0007.

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. 2017. “Pedoman Bahan Konstruksi Bangunan Dan Rekayasa Sipil: Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki.” SE Menteri PUPR 5–6.

Kementrian PU No. 3. 2014. “Perencanaan, Penyediaan, Dan Pemanfaatan Prasarana Dan Sarana Jaringan Pejalan Kaki Di Kawasan Perkotaan.”

Kep. Bina Marga. 1999. “Pedoman Teknik Penyandang Cacat.Pdf.”

Lestari, Fera. 2020. “Identifikasi Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki Di Kota Bandar Lampung.” JICE (Journal of Infrastructural in Civil Engineering) 1(01):27. doi: 10.33365/jice.v1i01.703.

Mulyanto, Hardi Agus, and Umar Abdul Aziz. 2020. “Studi Kenyamanan Pejalan Kaki Terhadap Pemanfaatan Trotoar Di Jalan KHA Dahlan Purworejo.” 4:9–16.

Purnomo, Wirdha. 2015. “Analisa Kepuasan Pelanggan Terhadap Bengkel Dengan Metode Ipa ( Importance Performance Analysis ) Di Pt . Arina Parama Jaya Gresik Wirdha Purnomo Dyah Riandadari.” 03:54–63.

Waani, Judy O. 2016. “Persepsi Pejalan Kaki Terhadap Keamanan Dan Kenyamanan Jalur Trotoar Di Pusat Kota Amurang.” Daseng: Jurnal Arsitektur 5(2):10–23.