Comparisonal Analysis of Costs And Working Time Column Using Semi System Form and Aluminum Form in Building Project Case Study : Osaka Riverview Apartment Project

Authors

  • Aji Tri Setiadi Civil Engineering Study Program, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta
  • Elhazri Hasdian Civil Engineering Study Program, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta
  • Yopi Lutfiansyah Civil Engineering Study Program, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta
  • Novika Candra Fertilia Civil Engineering Study Program, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta

Keywords:

Aluminum, Cost, Formwork, Semi System, Time

Abstract

In planning a building or infrastructure, various methods and strategies are needed to achieve the target for timely completion, resulting in a strong and beautiful quality building. Structural components such as foundations, columns, beams, and plates play an important role in supporting the establishment of a building. To produce the quality of the structural components required special skills in doing the job. Formwork has an important value as a mold (formwork) to form the dimensions of the structural components that have been planned. In this study, we will discuss the comparison of usage related to the cost and time of using different column formwork, namely semi-system formwork and aluminum formwork used to build multi-storey buildings. From the two types of formwork, the budget for formwork work will be analyzed to obtain an economical budget and efficient time.

 

The comparative analysis of formwork semi system and formwork aluminum get results, for formwork semi system requires a cost of Rp. 1,366,460,000 with an implementation time of 35 days while using aluminum formwork is Rp. 1,114,460,000 with an implementation time of 20 days. This means that using semi system formwork is more expensive by Rp. 252,000,000 compared to semi system formwork. Meanwhile, the implementation time for aluminum formwork is 15 days faster than semi-system formwork.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aek, P., & Wijaya, H. S. (2019). Analisa Perbandingan Penggunaan Bekisting Konvensional dengan Pra Cetak pada Pekerjaan Kolom Apartemen Begawan Malang. 2, 2–7. [email protected]

Barus, N. U., Sjah, J., & Rarasati, A. D. (2020). Performance evaluation of woven polyethylene formwork on tie beam and pile cap structure in terms of cost and time. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 8(3), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2020.080314

Pandu, I. M., Wiguna, W., Agung, I. G., Putera, A., & Dharmayanti, G. A. P. C. (2018). Analisis Penghematan Biaya Penggunaan Bekisting Pelat Lantai Konvensional Model Panel Pada Bangunan Tipikal ( Studi Kasus Pada Proyek Amartha Residence ) Cost Saving Analysis of the Use of Conventional Model Panel Formwork Slabs in Typical Buildings ( Cas. Jurnal Spektran, 6(1), 59–64.

Perwitasari, D., Susanti, J. E., & Mashur, A. R. H. (2016). Analisa Perbandingan Metode, Biaya dan Waktu Penggunaan Bekisting Aluminium dengan Bekisting Konvensional, Semi Konvensional dan Sistem (peri). 1–12.

Pratama, H. S., Anggraeni, R. K., Hidayat, A., & Khasani, R. R. (2017). Analisa Perbandingan Penggunaan Bekisting Konvensional, Semi Sistem, Dan Sistem (Peri) Pada Kolom Gedung Bertingkat. Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, 6(1), 303–313.

Sharmilaa, S. (2019). A Case Study and Comparison of the Conventional Formwork , Tunnel Formwork and Aluminium Formwork Systems. 8(10), 487–494.

Sonawane, V. A., & Ambre, H. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Aluminium Formwork Building and Conventional Formwork Building based on Duration by using Line of Balance ( LOB ) Technique. 06(05), 6386–6391.

Susanti, I. I. (2020). Analisa Perbandingan Metode Konvensional, Desklab dan Bondek pada Pekerjaan Bekisting Jembatan Girder Tipe I pada Proyek Jalan Tol Bogor – Ciawi - Sukabumi. Rekayasa Sipil, 8(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.22441//jrs.2019.v08.i2.01

Waghmare, A. P., Hangarge, R. S., Co-ordinator, P. G., Engineering, C., Soet, D. Y. P., Student, M. E., & Soet, D. Y. P. (2017). Cost and Time estimation for Conventional , Aluminium & Tunnel Formwork. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology(IRJET), 4(7), 5–8. https://irjet.net/archives/V4/i7/IRJET-V4I7363.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30